In the land of the free, we are given a choice every election cycle: Red or Blue. Coke or Pepsi. The illusion of choice wrapped in patriotic fanfare. But beneath the spectacle lies a truth most Americans feel in their gut but rarely say out loud: the two party system is a rigged game, a duopoly that has hijacked our democracy.
The Democratic and Republican parties are not ideological opposites; they are co-managers of an empire. One plays good cop while the other plays bad cop, but both serve the same masters: corporations, lobbyists, and the wealthy. They compete for power the way monopolists “compete”: by making sure no true alternative ever gains traction.
Independent and third-party candidates are routinely locked out of debates, buried by media blackouts, and crushed by impossible ballot access laws. Why? Because both parties know that real competition would expose how little they offer beyond symbolic bickering and bipartisan stagnation.
The duopoly thrives on division. Democrats and Republicans whip their bases into a frenzy over culture issues while quietly agreeing on endless war, corporate welfare, and mass surveillance. It’s no accident. The spectacle distracts us while they pass the same bloated Pentagon budgets and sell off public goods to private hands.
Gridlock isn’t a bug, it’s a feature. It keeps meaningful reform off the table. Medicare for All? Dead on arrival. A living wage? Maybe by 2050. Climate action? Let’s ask ExxonMobil how fast we can move. The duopoly ensures nothing truly threatens their donors’ profits.
Leftist movements such as socialists, anarchists, and greens are smeared or ignored not because they’re fringe, but because they challenge the core of the system: capitalism, imperialism, police power. The establishment doesn’t fear chaos, it fears organization. It fears a population that realizes there are more than two ways to govern ourselves.
Likewise, when libertarians call for ending wars or dismantling the surveillance state, they’re treated as dangerous radicals. Any idea outside the red-blue matrix must be neutralized.
So what’s the way out?
Break the machine.
It starts with refusing to legitimize the duopoly. Don’t let “vote blue no matter who” or “lesser evilism” guilt you into obedience. Demand more: ranked-choice voting, proportional representation, ballot access reform, we need mass political education and direct action.
We need to organize outside their system. That means building dual power: worker co-ops, mutual aid networks, radical unions, and community councils that don’t wait for permission from Washington. The future won’t be won in the voting booth alone. It will be built in the streets, on picket lines, and in the quiet rebellion of everyday people saying “enough is enough.”
The bottom line is this: the two party system is not a democracy. It’s monopoly politics. It doesn’t represent us. It contains us. And like all monopolies, it must be broken.
We don’t need better Democrats or nicer Republicans. We need a new system entirely, one that serves people and not profits.
Bang on, the idea that if you have two sides of a coin that somehow it’s not a coin but a pathway to freedom. Much of what goes on in politics to me seems to be rewording of the same stupid ideas – or corrupt acts to sanitise them for what ends up being semantics.
Both sides are on the payroll of business interests, this always reminds me of that Obama campaign – Change – aaaaand what changed? Just like how America is great now, it’s the same the world over. One party replaces another with slightly different policies which only ever benefit the rich. Is anything cheaper? Is the world more peaceful, free?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly. Two sides of the same bloodstained coin, flipped endlessly while we pretend it matters who calls heads. Meanwhile, the house always wins. Obama’s “Change” gave us drones, deportations, and bailouts. Trump shouted “drain the swamp” and filled it with billionaires. Biden promised normalcy and gave us genocide denial and corporate handouts.
The problem isn’t broken promises—it’s that the system works exactly as designed: to protect power and profit. If voting changed anything, they’d ban it. That’s why we have to build outside of it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I naively used to think that some politicians might actually be decent but that when they arrive in power some shadowy figure from the military turns up and says – well actually this is what’s going on and if you mess with the delicate balance all hell will break loose. Then hands the guy a note which authoresses unlimited spending for the military, freedom to torture and shares in big oil.
Silly me, they don’t have any intention on actually changing things just collecting the job at big oil when they finish their term.
Voting – ha – that’s right, the illusion of choice.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reminds me of that Bill Hicks joke:
“I believe the new president is taken into a dark room with the CIA and shown footage of the JFK assassination from a different angle. The footage stops and the CIA goes ‘any questions?’ to which the president replies, ‘Just what my agenda is.'”
And yeah, I’ve become disillusioned with voting. As the anarchist Emma Goldman said, “If voting changed anything, they’d make it illegal.”
LikeLike